Five systems in. One figure out.
Kolis reads what each company files, maps it into one schema and tests it against the covenant in force that quarter. The result is written once and never quietly changed.
English and French. GBP, EUR and USD.
01 Filed
The same line item, as five companies actually filed it.
- Systems
- QuickBooks, Sage, Cegid, Excel, a PDF by email
- Formats
- 1,024,500.00 and 1 310 000 and 880 000,00
- Filed by
- The company itself, in minutes
02 One schema
They file into one ledger. Every row the same width, the same order.
- Mapped to
- One field, turnover, whatever the line was called
- Ambiguous
- Asked about, never guessed. QuickBooks Total Income is flagged
- Written
- Once. A correction is a new row, the original stays
03 Tested
The ledger becomes the book: every borrower against its own covenant.
- The line
- Each facility's own level in force that quarter
- Over it
- Jarrow Print Group, 4.39x against 4.25x. Breach, 3.3% outside
- Near it
- Harlech Precision, 3.84x against 4.00x. Inside by 4.0%
Demonstration book, synthetic figures. Kolis reports a calculation; it does not declare a default.
Test a covenant yourselfFiled
Every company files in its own system. Kolis reads them all the same way.
Kolis treats the companies you hold or lend to as users, not data sources. Here is the same line item as five companies actually filed it. A line that could mean two things is asked about, not guessed.
- QuickBooks Total Income Flagged 1,024,500.00
- Sage Sales Revenue 742,000
- Cegid Chiffre d’affaires 1 310 000
- Excel Turnover (net of returns) 469,000
- PDF by email Revenue for the period 880 000,00
Mapped to
turnover
Four map cleanly and nothing is re-keyed. QuickBooks Total Income is a section subtotal that can carry interest, grants and FX gains, so it is asked about rather than assumed.
Recorded
Three rules the product will not break.
- 01
Nothing rewrites a filed figure. Not even you.
The filing table is append only. A correction files a new row and keeps the original, in every role including the fund’s own, and the screen shows where the two part company.
- 02
A figure nobody reported is absent, not zero.
Everywhere, including the exports and the covenant tests. A number that looks like a measurement and is not one is worse than its absence.
- 03
The company that files gets something back.
Filing takes minutes and partial submissions are accepted. A borrower reads its own covenant, with the working.
Tested
Put in a borrower’s figures. See the verdict Kolis would record.
Leverage and interest cover are the two covenants in almost every loan agreement, worked out here the way the product works them out, including when it refuses to give a number. It opens on the demonstration borrower; change any figure.
Certified result
Tested on what the borrower filed. Written once.
Net debt to EBITDA over twelve months, against the level in force that quarter. A restatement files a new result and keeps this one exactly as it was certified. No role can edit it, including yours.
Net debt to EBITDA
4.39x
covenant 4.25x maximum
Breach, 3.3% outside
- Net debt
- GBP 23,201,150
- EBITDA, four quarters to Q2 FY26
- GBP 5,285,000
The product
One dataset. Four audiences who should not see the same thing.
The same filing, served to each party as the thing it is entitled to see.
Shown
Each party sees only what is theirs.
Enforced in the database, not promised in the application. The lender and the borrower read the same result at the same moment. Anyone else is refused.
The lending partner
Holds the facility
- Borrower named
- Leverage 4.39x
- Covenant 4.25x
- Verdict Breach
- Book 18 of 18
That borrower’s own CFO
Files the figures
- Borrower itself only
- Leverage 4.39x
- Covenant 4.25x
- Verdict Breach
- Book refused
An investor in that fund
Holds capital in it
- Borrower refused
- Leverage refused
- Covenant refused
- Verdict refused
- Book by currency
A partner at another fund
No relationship to it
- Borrower refused
- Leverage refused
- Covenant refused
- Verdict refused
- Book refused
Which named company is outside its covenant is between the lender and that borrower. An investor in a lending fund is shown the book by currency, the spread and the count, and no row that identifies anyone. Counts read under each account’s own session against the live database, not from a policy.
The fund’s partner
Manages the holding
- Revenue £8.24m
- EBITDA £1.92m
- Net profit £1.38m
- Cash at bank £3.62m
- Receivables £1.49m
- Payables £440k
An investor in that fund
Holds capital in it
- Revenue £8.24m
- EBITDA £1.92m
- Net profit £1.38m
- Cash at bank refused
- Receivables refused
- Payables refused
A partner at another fund
No relationship to it
- Revenue refused
- EBITDA refused
- Net profit refused
- Cash at bank refused
- Receivables refused
- Payables refused
A company submits its detail to the fund that manages it. It did not agree to show its cash position to every investor in that fund, and it has no relationship at all with the fund next door. None of this is a filter on a page. The rows are not returned.
Where the data lives. The database runs in Frankfurt (eu-central-1). English and French. GBP, EUR and USD. Sub-processors are listed in the data processing agreement.
Read the data processing agreementRequest access
Kolis is taking its first funds.
It is built and it runs. The first conversation is a look at the working product rather than a deck, and a straight account of where it is.
Request access
One step left.
Your email app should have opened with the request written out. Press send there. If nothing opened, copy the text below and send it to:
omar@kolis.io